Cedric Delsaux - Genius or piggy backing off a well known franchise's success?
There's no doubt that Cedric Delsaux
can take a great photograph, especially of urban landscapes but upon
a closer look at his work, I found myself wondering if his images
would be getting a second glance if they didn’t contain well known
characters/ships from the Star Wars franchise.
Here's the cherry on top... Pierrick
Gueneugue ringing any bells? No? It's rare to find any articles
ACTUALLY crediting Pierrick, when In fact this is the man who does
all of the CGI (Photoshop) for Delsaux's images. So not only does Cedric Delsaux
incorporate George Lucas' original ideas into his images but he is
(possibly unknowingly) receiving all the acknowledgement when
Pierrick is adding those 'finishing touches' that his audience love
and remember to his images.
Cedric Delsaux will be the first to
admit that the original intent of his series 'Dark Lens' was not in
fact Star Wars related, But it was instead intended to be an
exhibition of our modern world, from the rise of skyscrapers to the
decay of urban fringe. But Delsaux found things were amiss when he
had finished his grand surveys of urban landscapes. He found that his
images were too monotonous, they were simply too plain and normal. So
in other words they had NO stand out qualities, no WOW factor,
nothing to make the viewer remember his images and want to continue
viewing them time and time again.
It's true. For example if you remove
the Star Wars characters from the following images, they cease to
have the same 'feeling'. Yes the images are sharp, 'edgy' and are
well shot but they cease to have any stand out qualities.
Would Cedric Delsaux have the same
recognition and fan base if he had (or should I say had Pierrick
Gueneugue) not incorporated Star wars into these images? Which leads
me back to my original question : Is Cedric Delsaux a genius or is he
simply piggybacking off a well known franchise's success?
No comments:
Post a Comment